Friday, 5 September 2008

Weaning the banks off the Old Lady's teat

There is a warm sense of security that comes from suckling liquidity from the teat of the central bank rather than foraging for capital and earnings in a harsh world full of threats and predators. Nonetheless, there comes a time when a good mother pushes away her importunate young and forces them to fend for themselves subject to her stern guidance and supervision.


Central banks have been suckling their broods of commercial banks since the credit crunch first exploded on the scene in August 2007. Now there are signs that the Bank of England and European Central Bank, at least, are keen to push their broods toward self-sufficiency, even at the risk that not all survive independently.


The Old Lady of Threadneedle Street has announced that she really, really means it when she says that the Special Liquidity Scheme introduced to enable banks to draw her gilts against mortgage-backed collateral will be closed down 20th October. The SLS was opened as a “one-off operation with a finite life” and was never intended to do more than bridge the liquidity gap created by the collapse of the mortgage-back securities market while banks adjusted their business models to changed market conditions.


The banks, led by UBS, are throwing temper tantrums, stamping their little feet, screaming in the financial press, but so far the Old Lady is holding firm. Mervyn King said last month:


"The SLS was introduced as a measure to deal with a legacy problem of liquidity of the stock of assets which banks owned last year when the crisis hit. So that window will close in October. The longer-term issue of tightening of credit conditions is much wider. That is to do with the health of the capital position of the banking system, and it's very important not to confuse the two".


Mr King’s determination to husband what remains of the Old Lady’s resources may have something to do with profligate abuse of them when opened to her brood. What started out as a scheme to extend up to £50 billion (a bit less than $100 million) in liquidity to shore up the UK credit markets during a surprise credit dislocation may have been drawn for as much as £200 billion in total as crunch turned to constriction. The Bank will only publish the true scale in October after the SLS closes. The SLS has been hungrily drained by banks keen to swap whatever unmarketable dross remained on their books for good central bank gilts.


The abuse has been made plain in numbers reported by the BIS.


Banks issued a record £45bn in mortgage-backed bonds in the three months to the end of June - more even than at the very height of the housing boom in 2006 - according to figures from the Bank for International Settlements. . . . . The Quarterly Review added: "Most of the UK issuance followed the Bank of England's announcement in April 2008 of a Special Liquidity Scheme (SLS) that enables UK banks to swap illiquid assets such as mortgage-backed securities against UK Treasury bills."


This record mortgage-backed issuance comes at a time when new mortgage lending in the UK has contracted very sharply, down 71 percent year on year for the month of July. That indicates a cynical abuse of the Old Lady’s generosity. Rather than be left with dry dugs dangling to her waist, the Old Lady would prefer to wean the banks while she retains ample bosom and sufficient other assets to shore up her public stature.


Over at the European Central Bank, a rule change this week will increase haircuts (discounts to stated market value) for collateral provided under that liquidity scheme from next February. The ECB has made available over EUR 367 billion (a bit less than $700 billion) under very liberal terms.


According the Financial Times:


The changes, which take effect from February 1, include increases in the average “haircuts” applied to asset-backed securities. A haircut is the amount deducted from the market value of a product when judging its value as collateral. In future, a blanket 12 per cent haircut will apply, replacing a previous sliding scale of between 2 per cent and 18 per cent. There will be penalties for asset-backed securities valued using models and for unsecured bank bonds.


Restrictions already in place on banks using assets they themselves had formed were extended to stop banks using assets from issues to which they had offered currency hedges or liquidity support above a certain level.


Analysts at Barclays Capital said the extra haircuts would mean banks might have to post an additional €25bn-€45bn of securities for collateral purposes. “That could cost €375m to €450m annually to banks ... Not in­significant, but probably bearable,” said Laurent Fransolet, analyst at Barcap.


The normally politic Yves Mersch made explicit reference in his remarks to "dangers of gaming the system".


Nonetheless, with house purchases falling to new lows and credit getting progressively tighter, the Labour government and the Council of Mortgage Lenders are wild to have another source of cheap liquidity if the Old Lady denies them. A new scheme for taxpayer-subsidised mortgage finance is in the offing. It is clearly bad public policy to have the government subsidise further borrowing for the housing sector after such a destructive bubble, but the scale of vested interest and the unpopularity of the Labour incumbents as the house prices fall make a new scheme a certainty all the same.


Rather like a mother who loves her young no matter how ill-bred, destructive and abusive they are to their peers or the community, the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street is unlikely to mind very much if British banks prosper by depredations on the politicians, taxpayers, market counterparties, corporate treasurers, hedge funds and others so long as they are out of the house. Having proved they have no sense of gratitude or duty to the Old Lady that preserved them in time of need, the others who will become their new targets can expect even less consideration.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's not the teat, it's the tumidity.

dink said...

"it's very important not to confuse the two"

I'm confused. In essence is he saying that the SLS was a mistake because they hadn't realized that the bank's assets were toxic?

I do like what I've read about Mervyn King so far. I wish we had an adult in our banking system who would call a stop to all this pretending.

Jesse said...

Paul Volcker just said that the crisis is "the most complex he has ever seen" and that any support for the banks must be accompanied by "additional regulation". The slowdown will be "the worst since the Great Depression."

In addition to high rates of interest, it appears that the reinstatement of some old regulatory safeguards will be required for the central bank to lend freely.
http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2008/09/volcker-says-crisis-most-complex-hes.html

London Banker said...

@ Jesse
Thanks for the Volker link. Yep. Scary times coming after the hype of the election passes in the US.

Anonymous said...

29 Bil BSC
25 Bil to 5 Tril FNM FRE
FDIC to open credit line with Treas
Big 3 Automakers to get gov't support
Airlines being gov't propped

Getting very bad out there. Any possibility of a revision from a debt crashing deflation to a full backstopping gov't with hyperinflationary printing?

Thai said...

Thanks for the great posting

So do you think she really means it this time?

raf said...

And just out on the wires: Darling proposing to extend or renew the SLS.

The die was cast this time last year with the Rock fall. The losses incurred by the privately owned banks will be socialised.

Plus ca change......as JPMorgan would have said.

Carlomagno said...

Beautifully written article. Thanks.